Continuous emissions monitoring, methane detection, discharge reports and release events.
Sources are sparse, awkward, or of a different provenance shape.
Stack concentrations as reported by the operator's monitors.
Detected plumes and estimated rates.
Periodic discharge values as reported by the permittee.
That a release was reported, when, and by whom.
An instrument read a value at a place and a time.
Someone recorded that a thing happened. An observation, not a reading.
Measured at a fixed station. The record discloses which one and how far it is from you.
Covers an area, not a point. There is no nearest station, and we will not invent one.
Reported by the party being observed. That is a weaker claim and the record says so on its face.
Published by an authoritative operator of the instrument.
Most of this lane is reported by the regulated party. There is an established reconciliation discipline around it, which is a strength, but the trust tier is not the same as a federal instrument and the page will not pretend otherwise.
Not named here yet. Candidate sources for this lane exist and are identified internally, but they have not been verified against the primary documentation — and an unverified source attribution on a public page is the exact mistake this company exists to avoid. They appear here when they have been checked, not before.
An enforcement action. A community exposure claim. A methane reporting obligation under a voluntary framework. Carbon or environmental credit verification.
That framing is our analysis of where disputes arise, not a claim of fact about any matter.
We are not capturing this lane today, so there is nothing here to sell you and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we do want is to know what you would actually ask it. Requests decide what gets built next — that is not a courtesy, it is how the order is set.