Fire weather, active perimeters, fuel moisture and smoke.
Authoritative sources exist and publish continuously. Adapter not built.
That a red flag warning was in force for an area at a time.
The mapped extent of a fire at a reporting time.
Measured moisture content at a monitoring site.
Thermal anomalies detected from orbit.
Analysed plume extent and density.
Someone recorded that a thing happened. An observation, not a reading.
An analyst or a model produced this from other data. It is a product, not a sensor.
An instrument read a value at a place and a time.
Covers an area, not a point. There is no nearest station, and we will not invent one.
Measured at a fixed station. The record discloses which one and how far it is from you.
An authoritative body's analytical product. Its uncertainty is the source's own.
Published by an authoritative operator of the instrument.
A perimeter is an area at a reporting time, not a value at a point. Asking whether an address was inside it is a spatial question with its own error bars, and those belong on the record.
Not named here yet. Candidate sources for this lane exist and are identified internally, but they have not been verified against the primary documentation — and an unverified source attribution on a public page is the exact mistake this company exists to avoid. They appear here when they have been checked, not before.
Utility liability for ignition under known fire-weather conditions. A business interruption claim from smoke. A negligence claim over operating during a red flag warning.
That framing is our analysis of where disputes arise, not a claim of fact about any matter.
We are not capturing this lane today, so there is nothing here to sell you and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we do want is to know what you would actually ask it. Requests decide what gets built next — that is not a courtesy, it is how the order is set.